Our point of view

Jeff HagenerLet's Hear It

FWP is sometimes accused of not listening to the public. We’re trying to change that. One way has been to improve our hunting season–setting procedure. We understand that hunting seasons are as much about the public’s values, desires, and opinions as they are about biology. So we’re making it easier for hunters and others to participate in the process and voice their preferences.

This past fall, for the first time, FWP solicited public comments and suggestions on hunting seasons before making recom­mendations to the FWP Commission. We received more than 300 comments, mostly from hunters. Some were specific: “Return to either-sex elk in the first week of areas 121, 122, and 123,” wrote one hunter. Others were less precise: “How about some muzzleloader-only seasons?” asked another. Many hunters recommended that we keep things as they are (“OK,” “Leave the same,” and “I feel the current season is good” were common responses). One kind-hearted hunter went so far as to write, “Keep up the good work!”

Some themes emerged:

Listening more closely to public concerns and suggestions doesn’t mean we can do what everyone asks. Some recommendations would not fly with the general hunting public, such as one asking that Montana allow harvest of hen pheasants. And consider our dilemma when one hunter asks FWP to allow more sheep hunting opportunities in the Missouri Breaks while another recommends we restrict sheep hunting there. Who do we listen to? That’s where science comes in, along with the judgment of biologists and commission members.

We can’t make everyone happy. But we can listen to what the public says and seriously consider their proposals and concerns.

Fortunately, most hunters seem to know that FWP can’t make every Montana hunting wish come true. One acknowledged as much with his comment on the bighorn sheep hunting season: “Would like to get drawn,” he wrote.

Wouldn’t we all.Bear bullet


Joe Maurier is Director of Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks